Juju Fars, PhD

Blog and other stuff

Perifoveal Cone- and Rod-Mediated Temporal Contrast Sensitivities in Stargardt Disease/Fundus Flavimaculatus


Journal article


Julien Fars, F. Pasutto, J. Kremers, C. Huchzermeyer
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2021

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMedCentral PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Fars, J., Pasutto, F., Kremers, J., & Huchzermeyer, C. (2021). Perifoveal Cone- and Rod-Mediated Temporal Contrast Sensitivities in Stargardt Disease/Fundus Flavimaculatus. Investigative Ophthalmology &Amp; Visual Science.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Fars, Julien, F. Pasutto, J. Kremers, and C. Huchzermeyer. “Perifoveal Cone- and Rod-Mediated Temporal Contrast Sensitivities in Stargardt Disease/Fundus Flavimaculatus.” Investigative ophthalmology & visual science (2021).


MLA   Click to copy
Fars, Julien, et al. “Perifoveal Cone- and Rod-Mediated Temporal Contrast Sensitivities in Stargardt Disease/Fundus Flavimaculatus.” Investigative Ophthalmology &Amp; Visual Science, 2021.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{julien2021a,
  title = {Perifoveal Cone- and Rod-Mediated Temporal Contrast Sensitivities in Stargardt Disease/Fundus Flavimaculatus},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Investigative ophthalmology & visual science},
  author = {Fars, Julien and Pasutto, F. and Kremers, J. and Huchzermeyer, C.}
}

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare L-cone–driven, S-cone–driven, and rod-driven temporal contrast sensitivities (tCSs) in patients with Stargardt disease 1/fundus flavimaculatus (STGD1/FF). Methods Fourteen patients (eight male, six female; mean age, 43.21 ± 13.18 years) with genetically confirmed STGD1/FF participated in this study. A dedicated light-emitting diode stimulator was used to measure perifoveal tCSs in an annular test field (1°–6° of visual eccentricity) at temporal frequencies between 1 and 20 Hz. Photoreceptor classes were isolated with the triple silent substitution technique. To compare functional damage among photoreceptor classes, sensitivity deviations (decibels) were calculated based on age-related normal values and then averaged across those frequencies where perception is mediated by the same post-receptoral pathway (L-cone red–green opponent pathway: 1, 2, 4 Hz; luminance pathway: 12, 16, 20 Hz; S-cone pathway: 1, 2, 4 Hz; fast rod pathway: 8, 10, 12 Hz). Sensitivity deviations were compared with infrared scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (IR-SLO) and standard automated perimetry (SAP). Results Photoreceptor-driven tCSs were generally lower in patients with STGD1/FF than in normal subjects but were without systematic differences among photoreceptors. Although sensitivity deviations were significantly correlated between each other, only luminance-driven L-cone sensitivity deviations were significantly correlated with the IR-SLO area of hyporeflectance (AoH) and SAP central mean deviation within 6° eccentricity (MD6deg). Conclusions No systematic differences between photoreceptor classes were detected; however, our data suggest that temporal contrasts detected by the luminance pathway were closely correlated with other clinical parameters (AoH and MD6deg) and might be most useful as functional biomarkers in clinical trials.


Share


Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in